Honest comparison

Lucida vs Keka Hire.

Keka is one of the best Indian HRMS platforms. Their bundle (payroll + attendance + leave + performance + hiring under one bill) is a real value. Keka Hire is the hiring module within that bundle — not a standalone AI hiring product. As of , Keka's hiring page lists a structured AI-led screening interview with transcripts and scores under "Keka AI" — a real capability, not a gimmick. Which plan includes it, and what it costs, isn't published. The difference now is what the score is anchored to and how defensible it is, not whether AI screening exists at all.

The one-paragraph answer

If you're already running payroll + attendance + leave on Keka, Keka Hire is the obvious add-on. One bill, one vendor, one login — and as of October 2026 its hiring page also lists an AI-led screening interview with transcripts and scores, not just basic ATS + structured workflow.

If your problem is hiring quality, not HRMS, Lucida. We don't do payroll, attendance, leave, performance, or expense — and we never will. We do one thing: AI scoring with cited evidence, candidate feedback for every applicant, and a calibration loop that gets sharper with every hire.

Feature comparison

LucidaKeka Hire
Price (entry) ₹2,499 / month, single admin Not published — free trial or demo
HRMS bundle (payroll · attendance · leave · perf) No, never will Yes, the actual reason to use Keka
AI scoring with cited evidence Per dimension, every candidate CV–JD match score + AI interview scores; quote-level citation not publicly claimed
AI-led screening interview (transcripts + scores) Built, held back for compliance review — not public yet Listed under Keka AI · plan and price not published
JD clarification pre-pass Asks before drafting Not present
Candidate feedback report Automatic, every applicant Manual / templated
Outcome → rubric calibration 90-day survey · /admin/insights Tracks 90-day performance + early attrition; no rubric feedback claimed
Audit trail (DPDPA / AEDT / EU AI Act) Per-row, every score, Save-as-PDF HRMS-grade compliance, not AI-decision-specific
India-native DPDPA-by-default · GST invoice · Tier-2/3 channels India-founded, strong on Indian compliance
Multi-user / pipeline stages Single admin, no stages beyond shortlist Full pipeline + recruiter collaboration
Best fit Founder screening candidates, wants better hires 20-200 person team wanting one HRMS for everything

Where Keka wins (and we mean it)

  • The HRMS bundle economics. If you need payroll + attendance + leave + performance, running them in separate tools means more bills, more logins and more reconciling than one suite. Hard to compete with vertical integration.
  • Pipeline + recruiter collaboration. If multiple people need to comment on candidates, move them through stages, assign owners — Keka has the workflow. Lucida is single-admin.
  • Already in your stack. Switching cost is real. If Keka HRMS is running, Keka Hire is the path of least resistance.
  • AI screening interview, on their page today. Keka's hiring page describes a structured AI-led screening interview with transcripts and scores. Lucida built the equivalent (anchored scoring, bounded follow-ups) and is holding it back for a compliance review before it ships — Keka got there first.

Where Lucida wins

  • Hiring is the product, not a module. Lucida exists for one thing: making the hire-no-hire decision better. Every line of code is in service of that. Keka Hire is one tab in a sprawling HRMS — gets attention proportional to how it ranks against payroll bugs.
  • Cited-evidence scoring. Every score in Lucida quotes the résumé or interview answer that produced it. Keka's public pages describe scores and transcripts but don't claim each score is tied to a quote — you trust the rank or you don't.
  • The candidate-feedback report. Every applicant — even rejected — gets a private URL with their score breakdown. Keka does not write these; a personalised report for every applicant only works when AI is doing the writing, not a human recruiter.
  • The calibration loop. Over time, Lucida tells you "your Mentorship dimension didn't predict hires; consider reweighting". Keka tracks funnel conversion and hiring quality (offer acceptance, 90-day performance, early attrition); Lucida goes one step further and shows which of your own rubric dimensions actually predicted those outcomes.

The pragmatic move

Use both. Run Keka for HRMS — payroll, attendance, leave, performance reviews. Use Lucida for the scoring + feedback layer Keka Hire isn't built for. Lucida's bulk-paste import handles résumés from Keka exports; the embed widget runs on your existing Keka careers page if you have one.

Most of our customers who came from Keka kept Keka for HR and added Lucida for scoring. Different jobs, different products. We didn't try to compete with the bundle.